Your personal contact

Jörg Hennig - AMETHYST Rechtsanwälte

Jörg Hen­nig

Lawyer

+49 (0)30 236 252 90


Anika Nadler - AMETHYST Rechtsanwälte

Ani­ka Nadler

Lawyer

+49 (0)30 236 252 90

Distinction between service contracts and contracts to produce a work as well as risk sharing

Distinction Between Contracts in Germany — Clarify Your Contract Structure

Choos­ing the right con­tract is essen­tial when your com­pa­ny engages exter­nal per­son­nel in Ger­many. A ser­vice con­tract (Dien­stver­trag), a work con­tract (Werkver­trag) and staff leas­ing (Arbeit­nehmerüber­las­sung) have dif­fer­ent legal require­ments and allo­cate respon­si­bil­i­ty differently.

The contract’s title alone does not deter­mine its legal clas­si­fi­ca­tion. What mat­ters is how the arrange­ment is actu­al­ly car­ried out — includ­ing who directs the employ­ees and who is respon­si­ble for deliv­er­ing the agreed ser­vice or result.

AMETHYST Recht­san­wälte advis­es com­pa­nies on con­tract clas­si­fi­ca­tion, staff leas­ing risks and legal­ly com­pli­ant per­son­nel structures.

Service Contract: The Service Is What Matters

Under a ser­vice con­tract, the ser­vice provider under­takes to per­form the agreed activ­i­ties but does not gen­er­al­ly guar­an­tee a spe­cif­ic result.

The cus­tomer pays for the ser­vices pro­vid­ed, even if the intend­ed out­come is not achieved.

Typ­i­cal exam­ples include:

  • IT sup­port and maintenance
  • Con­sult­ing services
  • Agency ser­vices

The ser­vice provider gen­er­al­ly organ­is­es the per­for­mance inde­pen­dent­ly. If, in prac­tice, the cus­tomer directs the indi­vid­ual employ­ees and inte­grates them into its own organ­i­sa­tion, the arrange­ment may need to be assessed under the AÜG.

Work Contract: A Defined Result Is Required

Under a work con­tract, the con­trac­tor under­takes to deliv­er a defined result or com­plet­ed work. The con­trac­tor is gen­er­al­ly respon­si­ble for that result and may be required to rem­e­dy defects.

Typ­i­cal exam­ples include:

  • Repair work
  • Instal­la­tion projects
  • Man­u­fac­tur­ing spe­cif­ic products

The con­trac­tor gen­er­al­ly deter­mines how the work is per­formed. The cus­tomer may spec­i­fy the required out­come but does not ordi­nar­i­ly direct the contractor’s employ­ees in their day-to-day work.

Staff Leasing: When the AÜG May Apply

Staff leas­ing (also called labour leas­ing) dif­fers from both con­tract types: It gen­er­al­ly involves employ­ees being sup­plied to a client, inte­grat­ed into the client’s organ­i­sa­tion and sub­ject to the client’s work-relat­ed instructions.

This dis­tinc­tion can be par­tic­u­lar­ly impor­tant in out­sourc­ing, project work and mixed oper­a­tional arrangements.

A ser­vice or work con­tract does not pre­vent the AÜG from apply­ing if the actu­al arrange­ment con­sti­tutes staff leas­ing. If a licence is required, the rel­e­vant autho­ri­sa­tion and statu­to­ry require­ments must be addressed.

Read more about Labour Leas­ing in Ger­many.

Contractual Terms Must Match Actual Practice

The Fed­er­al Employ­ment Agency may exam­ine both the writ­ten agree­ments and how the work is per­formed in prac­tice. Incon­sis­ten­cies can expose the par­ties to legal and finan­cial risks, includ­ing poten­tial admin­is­tra­tive fines.

Before enter­ing into an arrange­ment, com­pa­nies should clarify:

  • Who assigns and super­vis­es the employ­ees’ day-to-day work?
  • Who is respon­si­ble for deliv­er­ing the agreed ser­vice or result?
  • Who organ­is­es and man­ages the work?
  • Do the writ­ten con­tracts reflect the actu­al oper­a­tional arrangements?
  • Could the struc­ture qual­i­fy as labour leas­ing and require an AÜG licence?

The solu­tion is not sim­ply to choose a dif­fer­ent con­tract label. The con­trac­tu­al struc­ture and the actu­al work­ing arrange­ments must be consistent.

If your com­pa­ny sup­plies or engages exter­nal per­son­nel in Ger­many, an ear­ly legal review can help iden­ti­fy risks before they become a reg­u­la­to­ry problem.

AÜG and Contract Advice from AMETHYST Rechtsanwälte

Labour leas­ing has been a cen­tral focus of our prac­tice for many years. AMETHYST Recht­san­wälte advis­es com­pa­nies nation­wide on AÜG licens­ing, con­trac­tu­al struc­tures and com­pli­ance with Ger­man employ­ment law.

Our expe­ri­ence includes over 1,000 AÜG cas­es and more than 25 years of pro­fes­sion­al expe­ri­ence. We com­bine spe­cialised legal exper­tise with prac­ti­cal advice tai­lored to your busi­ness model.

We can help you with:

  • Con­tract clas­si­fi­ca­tion: Assess­ing whether a ser­vice con­tract, work con­tract or staff leas­ing arrange­ment reflects the actu­al relationship.
  • Con­tract draft­ing and review: Align­ing con­trac­tu­al pro­vi­sions with oper­a­tional practice.
  • AÜG licence appli­ca­tions: Advis­ing on licens­ing require­ments and sup­port­ing the appli­ca­tion process.
  • Com­pli­ance and audits: Iden­ti­fy­ing poten­tial issues before or dur­ing a review by the Fed­er­al Employ­ment Agency.
  • Dis­putes and reg­u­la­to­ry pro­ceed­ings: Advis­ing and rep­re­sent­ing com­pa­nies where the clas­si­fi­ca­tion or legal­i­ty of an arrange­ment is challenged.

If your arrange­ment may qual­i­fy as staff leas­ing, learn more about the AÜG Licence Appli­ca­tion Process or our advice on AÜG Audit Pro­ce­dures.

Clarify Your Contract Structure Before Work Begins

The right legal assess­ment can help your com­pa­ny choose an appro­pri­ate con­trac­tu­al mod­el, allo­cate respon­si­bil­i­ties clear­ly and reduce the risk of AÜG violations.

Con­tact AMETHYST Recht­san­wälte to dis­cuss your con­tract struc­ture and the legal require­ments for your per­son­nel arrange­ments in Ger­many.

Deep Dive: Service Contract & Work Contract in Germany

This dis­tinc­tion is impor­tant because dif­fer­ent rights and con­se­quences can be derived from them in law and in fact. Con­tract and invoic­ing prac­tice should there­fore be as accu­rate as possible.

Service contract

Under a ser­vice con­tract, one par­ty pro­vides a ser­vice for the oth­er par­ty.

The ser­vice provider pro­vides his ser­vices inde­pen­dent­ly and is usu­al­ly not bound by the customer’s instruc­tions, but in con­trast to a con­tract to pro­duce a work, the ser­vice provider does not owe a con­crete work result. The ser­vice provider is only oblig­ed to work for the cus­tomer who bears the entre­pre­neur­ial risk. Even if the desired suc­cess is ulti­mate­ly not achieved, the cus­tomer is oblig­ed to pay for the pro­vi­sion of the services. 

The clas­sic ser­vice con­tract, for exam­ple, is a con­tract for med­ical treat­ment. The physi­cian does not owe the patien­t’s recov­ery, but is only oblig­ed to pro­vide cor­rect treat­ment. In the busi­ness world, ser­vice con­tracts come in many dif­fer­ent forms, for exam­ple, as main­te­nance con­tracts for IT sys­tems, as con­sul­tan­cy or as agency contracts.

Contract to produce a work

The pro­duc­er of a work owes his cus­tomer a ‘suc­cess’ or a ‘work’. The pro­duc­er of the work is there­fore liable to the cus­tomer. The pro­duc­er of the work is also liable for his work and he is oblig­ed to rem­e­dy defects. The cus­tomer is oblig­ed to accept the ‘work’. The pro­duc­er of the work is not enti­tled to claim remu­ner­a­tion until the work has been accept­ed. This means that the pro­duc­er of the work bears the entre­pre­neur­ial risk.

The cus­tomer is not enti­tled to issue instruc­tions regard­ing indi­vid­ual work steps. He can only issue gen­er­al, work-relat­ed instruc­tions to the pro­duc­er of the work (orders, spec­i­fi­ca­tions, etc.).

The clas­sic con­tract to pro­duce a work, for exam­ple, is a con­tract for repair work with a mechan­ic. Con­tracts to pro­duce a work exist in many dif­fer­ent forms in the busi­ness world, for exam­ple, as instal­la­tion ser­vices in the IT sec­tor, in project work or in the man­u­fac­ture of prod­ucts. 

Practical Tip: It All Comes Down to How It’s Put Into Practice

The risk when choos­ing the form of con­tract is that the Fed­er­al Employ­ment Agency (Bun­de­sagen­tur für Arbeit) checks pre­cise­ly which form of work is stip­u­lat­ed in the writ­ten con­tract and which one is then actu­al­ly car­ried out. It is, for instance, not per­mis­si­ble to des­ig­nate a con­tract as a ‘con­tract to pro­duce a work or ser­vice con­tract’, although employ­ees are in fact hired out with­in the frame­work of tem­po­rary employ­ment (AÜG). Oth­er­wise a fine of up to EUR 30,000 may be imposed (read more on Fine Pro­ceed­ings Under the AÜG).

In order to avoid any risk, it is bet­ter to con­clude a tem­po­rary employ­ment con­tract rather than a con­tract to pro­duce a work or a ser­vice con­tract (read more on The Pro­vi­sion of Tem­po­rary Work­ers in Con­trast to Oth­er Forms of Con­tract). Espe­cial­ly the lat­ter form is often very sim­i­lar to the tem­po­rary employ­ment con­tract. The tem­po­rary employ­ment con­tract should express­ly state that it is a tem­po­rary employ­ment contract.